⚔️HEAD-TO-HEAD
Shubman Gill vs Wellington Masakadza — International Fantasy Cricket Stats Comparison
Shubman Gill has the edge on the headline numbers: Shubman Gill leads on T20I batting (869 runs, avg 28.0). Full T20I, ODI, Test and IPL stats are below.
Shubman Gill (India) has 869 T20I runs at avg 28.0 in 36 matches. Wellington Masakadza (Zimbabwe) has 259 T20I runs at avg 8.6 in 75 matches. Head-to-head batting, bowling & fielding across T20I, ODI & Test.
Full season · batting · bowling · fielding · MOTM · form
Shubman Gill vs Wellington Masakadza — Stat Comparison Table
Head-to-head numbers at a glance. Higher value is highlighted in green (lower is better for economy and bowling/batting averages).
| Statistic | Shubman Gill | Wellington Masakadza |
|---|---|---|
| Matches | 20 | 7 |
| Avg fantasy points | 109 | 22 |
| Best fantasy score | 329 | 75 |
| Runs | 1288 | 42 |
| Strike rate | 113.5 | 102.4 |
| Fours | 163 | 5 |
| Sixes | 29 | 0 |
| Half-centuries (50+) | 6 | 0 |
| Centuries (100+) | 5 | 0 |
| Highest score | 223 | 14 |
| Wickets | 0 | 3 |
| Economy rate | 4.00 | 7.52 |
| Best spell (wkts) | 0 | 2 |
| Catches | 12 | 2 |
| Total dismissals | 15 | 2 |
| Statistic | Shubman Gill | Wellington Masakadza |
|---|---|---|
| Matches | 36 | 75 |
| Runs | 869 | 259 |
| Batting average | 28.03 | 8.63 |
| Centuries (100+) | 1 | 0 |
| Half-centuries (50+) | 3 | 0 |
| Wickets | 0 | 48 |
| Bowling average | — | 31.60 |
| Economy rate | — | 7.45 |
📋 Format by format
T20I. Shubman Gill has played 36 T20Is and Wellington Masakadza 75. Shubman Gill has 869 runs at 28.0, against 259 at 8.6 for Wellington Masakadza, so Shubman Gill has scored more. Hundreds: Shubman Gill 1, Wellington Masakadza 0. Fifties: 3 and 0. Wellington Masakadza also bowls: 48 wickets at an economy of 7.45, while Shubman Gill has not taken a T20I wicket.
ODI. Shubman Gill has played 70 ODIs and Wellington Masakadza 42. Shubman Gill has 3,713 runs at 64.0, against 243 at 11.1 (64.8) for Wellington Masakadza, so Shubman Gill has scored more. Hundreds: Shubman Gill 11, Wellington Masakadza 0. Fifties: 20 and 0. Wellington Masakadza also bowls: 33 wickets, while Shubman Gill has not taken a ODI wicket.
Test. Shubman Gill has played 43 Tests and Wellington Masakadza 7. Shubman Gill has 3,043 runs at 43.5, against 159 at 13.3 (30.4) for Wellington Masakadza, so Shubman Gill has scored more. Hundreds: Shubman Gill 11, Wellington Masakadza 0. Fifties: 8 and 1. Wellington Masakadza also bowls: 19 wickets at an economy of 3.43, while Shubman Gill has not taken a Test wicket.
International numbers up to 1 September 2026.
Shubman Gill vs Wellington Masakadza — T20I is a highly-debated cricket matchup. Below are their T20I career highlights.
T20I career: Shubman Gill has scored 869 T20I runs in 36 matches at an average of 28.03, with 1 century.
T20I career: Wellington Masakadza has scored 259 T20I runs in 75 matches at an average of 8.63. He has also taken 48 T20I wickets at an average of 31.60 with an economy of 7.45.
Fantasy Impact: From a pure fantasy perspective, Shubman Gill is the stronger pick with an average of 109 pts per game in recent fantasy cricket. Always check the playing XI and toss before locking in your captain.
Stats are sourced from international career records. Compare more players using our Player Comparison Tool.
Who has better fantasy stats — Shubman Gill or Wellington Masakadza?
Shubman Gill vs Wellington Masakadza — who is a better fantasy captain?
Who has a better strike rate — Shubman Gill or Wellington Masakadza?
What is the price difference between Shubman Gill and Wellington Masakadza?
How many MOTM awards have Shubman Gill and Wellington Masakadza won?
Should I pick Shubman Gill or Wellington Masakadza in my fantasy XI?
Who has more T20I runs, Shubman Gill or Wellington Masakadza?
Who has more ODI runs, Shubman Gill or Wellington Masakadza?
Who has more Test runs, Shubman Gill or Wellington Masakadza?
SETTLE IT IN A GAME
Numbers only get you so far. Pick a side — Shubman Gill or Wellington Masakadza — and see who actually delivers.
Found an issue or have a suggestion? Contact us — we’d love to hear from you.