⚔️HEAD-TO-HEAD
Shubman Gill vs Wessly Madhevere — International Fantasy Cricket Stats Comparison
Shubman Gill has the edge on the headline numbers: Shubman Gill leads on T20I batting (869 runs, avg 28.0). Full T20I, ODI, Test and IPL stats are below.
Shubman Gill (India) has 869 T20I runs at avg 28.0 in 36 matches. Wessly Madhevere (Zimbabwe) has 1,247 T20I runs at avg 19.5 in 77 matches. Head-to-head batting, bowling & fielding across T20I, ODI & Test.
Full season · batting · bowling · fielding · MOTM · form
Shubman Gill vs Wessly Madhevere — Stat Comparison Table
Head-to-head numbers at a glance. Higher value is highlighted in green (lower is better for economy and bowling/batting averages).
| Statistic | Shubman Gill | Wessly Madhevere |
|---|---|---|
| Matches | 20 | 15 |
| Avg fantasy points | 109 | 48 |
| Best fantasy score | 329 | 122 |
| Runs | 1288 | 305 |
| Strike rate | 113.5 | 85.4 |
| Fours | 163 | 27 |
| Sixes | 29 | 4 |
| Half-centuries (50+) | 6 | 2 |
| Centuries (100+) | 5 | 0 |
| Highest score | 223 | 77 |
| Wickets | 0 | 7 |
| Economy rate | 4.00 | 6.68 |
| Best spell (wkts) | 0 | 3 |
| Catches | 12 | 8 |
| Total dismissals | 15 | 9 |
| Statistic | Shubman Gill | Wessly Madhevere |
|---|---|---|
| Matches | 36 | 77 |
| Runs | 869 | 1247 |
| Batting average | 28.03 | 19.48 |
| Strike rate | — | 114.4 |
| Centuries (100+) | 1 | 0 |
| Half-centuries (50+) | 3 | 7 |
| Wickets | 0 | 19 |
| Bowling average | — | 28.68 |
| Economy rate | — | 7.08 |
📋 Format by format
T20I. Shubman Gill has played 36 T20Is and Wessly Madhevere 77. Shubman Gill has 869 runs at 28.0, against 1,247 at 19.5 (114.4) for Wessly Madhevere, so Wessly Madhevere has scored more. Hundreds: Shubman Gill 1, Wessly Madhevere 0. Fifties: 3 and 7. Wessly Madhevere also bowls: 19 wickets at an economy of 7.08, while Shubman Gill has not taken a T20I wicket.
ODI. Shubman Gill has played 70 ODIs and Wessly Madhevere 40. Shubman Gill has 3,713 runs at 64.0, against 841 at 22.7 (79.0) for Wessly Madhevere, so Shubman Gill has scored more. Hundreds: Shubman Gill 11, Wessly Madhevere 0. Fifties: 20 and 7. Wessly Madhevere also bowls: 16 wickets at an economy of 5.20, while Shubman Gill has not taken a ODI wicket.
Test. Shubman Gill has played 43 Tests and Wessly Madhevere 7. Shubman Gill has 3,043 runs at 43.5, against 321 at 29.2 (53.7) for Wessly Madhevere, so Shubman Gill has scored more. Hundreds: Shubman Gill 11, Wessly Madhevere 0. Fifties: 8 and 2. Wessly Madhevere also bowls: 7 wickets at an economy of 3.68, while Shubman Gill has not taken a Test wicket.
International numbers up to 1 September 2026.
Shubman Gill vs Wessly Madhevere — T20I is a highly-debated cricket matchup. Below are their T20I career highlights.
T20I career: Shubman Gill has scored 869 T20I runs in 36 matches at an average of 28.03, with 1 century.
T20I career: Wessly Madhevere has scored 1,247 T20I runs in 77 matches at an average of 19.48, with 7 half-centuries. He has also taken 19 T20I wickets at an average of 28.68 with an economy of 7.08.
Fantasy Impact: From a pure fantasy perspective, Shubman Gill is the stronger pick with an average of 109 pts per game in recent fantasy cricket. Always check the playing XI and toss before locking in your captain.
Stats are sourced from international career records. Compare more players using our Player Comparison Tool.
Who has better fantasy stats — Shubman Gill or Wessly Madhevere?
Shubman Gill vs Wessly Madhevere — who is a better fantasy captain?
Who has a better strike rate — Shubman Gill or Wessly Madhevere?
What is the price difference between Shubman Gill and Wessly Madhevere?
How many MOTM awards have Shubman Gill and Wessly Madhevere won?
Should I pick Shubman Gill or Wessly Madhevere in my fantasy XI?
Who has more T20I runs, Shubman Gill or Wessly Madhevere?
Who has more ODI runs, Shubman Gill or Wessly Madhevere?
Who has more Test runs, Shubman Gill or Wessly Madhevere?
SETTLE IT IN A GAME
Numbers only get you so far. Pick a side — Shubman Gill or Wessly Madhevere — and see who actually delivers.
Found an issue or have a suggestion? Contact us — we’d love to hear from you.