⚔️HEAD-TO-HEAD

Washington Sundar vs Will Jacks: Who Is Better? International Stats Comparison

Who is better — Washington Sundar or Will Jacks?

Will Jacks has the edge on the headline numbers: Will Jacks leads on T20I batting (684 runs, avg 22.1). Full T20I, ODI, Test and IPL stats are below.

Washington Sundar (India) has 254 T20I runs at avg 16.9 in 58 matches. Will Jacks (England) has 684 T20I runs at avg 22.1 in 48 matches. Head-to-head batting, bowling & fielding across T20I, ODI & Test.

Full season · batting · bowling · fielding · MOTM · form

TweetWhatsApp
PLAYER 1
🏏
Washington Sundar
🇮🇳 IND · 8.5 cr
VS
PLAYER 2
🏏
Will Jacks
🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿 ENG · 8.5 cr
🏏
Washington Sundar
🇮🇳 India
AR
8.5 cr
Credits
53
Avg Pts
223
Best FP
160.2
Pts/Cr
387
Total Runs
9
Total Wkts
🏏
Will Jacks
🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿 England
BAT🌏 OS🏅 2× MOTM
8.5 cr
Credits
69
Avg Pts
230
Best FP
222.9
Pts/Cr
545
Total Runs
12
Total Wkts
🔥 Clear Pick
🏏 Will Jacks
16 higher avg pts · 230 best fantasy score · 2× MOTM
🏏 Washington Sundar
VS
🏏 Will Jacks
T20I Career Overview
58Matches48
🏏 Batting
254Runs684
16.93Batting Avg22.06
0Centuries0
1Half-Centuries1
14Sixes 🔴32
50
Best Score
53*
🎳 Bowling
51Wickets22
22.80Bowling Avg22.64
7.08Economy Rate—
05-Wkt Hauls0
3/3
Best Figures
3/14
Source: Cricsheet (cricsheet.org, CC BY 4.0) · International matches only

Washington Sundar vs Will Jacks — Stat Comparison Table

Head-to-head numbers at a glance. Higher value is highlighted in green (lower is better for economy and bowling/batting averages).

IPL season stats
StatisticWashington SundarWill Jacks
Matches2020
Avg fantasy points5369
Best fantasy score223230
Runs387545
Strike rate112.2126.5
Fours3744
Sixes925
Half-centuries (50+)45
Highest score5266
Wickets912
Economy rate5.176.49
Best spell (wkts)55
Catches812
Total dismissals813
International career — T20I
StatisticWashington SundarWill Jacks
Matches5848
Runs254684
Batting average16.9322.06
Half-centuries (50+)11
Wickets5122
Bowling average22.8022.64
Economy rate7.08—

📋 Format by format

T20I. Washington Sundar has played 58 T20Is and Will Jacks 48. Washington Sundar has 254 runs at 16.9, against 684 at 22.1 for Will Jacks, so Will Jacks has scored more. With the ball, Washington Sundar has 51 wickets at an economy of 7.08 and Will Jacks 22; Washington Sundar has more wickets.

ODI. Washington Sundar has played 31 ODIs and Will Jacks 29. Washington Sundar has 426 runs at 22.4 (strike rate 81.9), against 802 at 34.9 for Will Jacks, so Will Jacks has scored more. With the ball, Washington Sundar has 29 wickets at an economy of 4.91 and Will Jacks 16; Washington Sundar has more wickets.

Test. Washington Sundar has played 17 Tests and Will Jacks 6. Washington Sundar has 885 runs at 42.1 (strike rate 45.9), against 234 at 21.3 (51.7) for Will Jacks, so Washington Sundar has scored more. Hundreds: Washington Sundar 1, Will Jacks 0. Fifties: 5 and 0. With the ball, Washington Sundar has 36 wickets at an economy of 3.26 and Will Jacks 12 at 4.61; Washington Sundar has more wickets.

International numbers up to 19 July 2026.

Stats updated
⚡ Strengths & Captaincy Pick
🏏 Washington Sundar
✓ Better economy rate
🏏 Will Jacks
✓ Superior run-scorer
✓ Higher strike rate
✓ More big-hitting sixes
✓ More wickets
✓ Higher avg fantasy pts
✓ More MOTM awards
👑 Captaincy Recommendation
C: 🏏 Will Jacks
69 avg pts · 230 best · 2 MOTM
VC: 🏏 Washington Sundar
Captaining Will Jacks gives you 2× pts. Always verify playing XI before locking.
📝 T20I Career Comparison

Washington Sundar vs Will Jacks — T20I is a highly-debated cricket matchup. Below are their T20I career highlights.

T20I career: Washington Sundar has scored 254 T20I runs in 58 matches at an average of 16.93, with 1 half-century. He has also taken 51 T20I wickets at an average of 22.80 with an economy of 7.08.

T20I career: Will Jacks has scored 684 T20I runs in 48 matches at an average of 22.06, with 1 half-century. He has also taken 22 T20I wickets at an average of 22.64.

Fantasy Impact: From a pure fantasy perspective, Will Jacks is the stronger pick with an average of 69 pts per game in recent fantasy cricket. Always check the playing XI and toss before locking in your captain.

Stats are sourced from international career records. Compare more players using our Player Comparison Tool.

❓ Frequently Asked Questions

Who has better fantasy stats — Washington Sundar or Will Jacks?

Based on recent data, Will Jacks has the edge with a higher average of 69 fantasy points per game. Will Jacks leads in runs scored (545 runs). Overall Will Jacks is the stronger fantasy pick this season.

Washington Sundar vs Will Jacks — who is a better fantasy captain?

Will Jacks is the recommended fantasy captain pick, averaging 69 pts per game with a best score of 230 pts. As captain you earn 2× points, so choosing the player in better form is crucial. Always check the toss and playing XI before finalising your captain.

Who has a better strike rate — Washington Sundar or Will Jacks?

Will Jacks has the superior batting strike rate this season (126.5), making them more valuable in T20 cricket where quick scoring is rewarded with bonus fantasy points.

What is the price difference between Washington Sundar and Will Jacks?

Washington Sundar costs 8.5 Cr and Will Jacks costs 8.5 Cr in current fantasy. The player with lower credits who delivers similar points gives you better value, freeing up budget for other expensive picks.

How many MOTM awards have Washington Sundar and Will Jacks won?

Washington Sundar has won 0 Man of the Match awards and Will Jacks has won 2 MOTM awards. MOTM winners earn +25 bonus fantasy points, making them extremely valuable.

Should I pick Washington Sundar or Will Jacks in my fantasy XI?

If you can only pick one, Will Jacks is the statistically stronger fantasy cricket pick this season. However, consider the match conditions — if India are favourites, more of their players will contribute, and vice versa for England. Use this comparison tool to make an informed decision every match.

Who has more T20I runs, Washington Sundar or Will Jacks?

Will Jacks has more T20I runs: Washington Sundar has 254 in 58 matches (average 16.9) and Will Jacks has 684 in 48 (average 22.1).

Who has taken more T20I wickets, Washington Sundar or Will Jacks?

Washington Sundar has more T20I wickets: Washington Sundar has 51 at an average of 22.8 and Will Jacks has 22 at 22.6.

Who has more ODI runs, Washington Sundar or Will Jacks?

Will Jacks has more ODI runs: Washington Sundar has 426 in 31 matches (average 22.4) and Will Jacks has 802 in 29 (average 34.9).

Who has taken more ODI wickets, Washington Sundar or Will Jacks?

Washington Sundar has more ODI wickets: Washington Sundar has 29 at an average of 29.3 and Will Jacks has 16 at 38.3.

Who has more Test runs, Washington Sundar or Will Jacks?

Washington Sundar has more Test runs: Washington Sundar has 885 in 17 matches (average 42.1) and Will Jacks has 234 in 6 (average 21.3).

Who has taken more Test wickets, Washington Sundar or Will Jacks?

Washington Sundar has more Test wickets: Washington Sundar has 36 at an average of 33.0 and Will Jacks has 12 at 46.2.
READY TO PLAY?
Pick Sundar & Jacks in your fantasy XI
Free to play · No prize pool · Just bragging rights
Build XI →

SETTLE IT IN A GAME

Numbers only get you so far. Pick a side — Washington Sundar or Will Jacks — and see who actually delivers.

Found an issue or have a suggestion? Contact us — we’d love to hear from you.

CricketDreamCRICKETDREAM FANTASY
© 2026 CricketDream · Fantasy Cricket Platform · Built for cricket fans
Disclaimer: This platform is intended for users aged 18 years and above only. CricketDream is a free, skill-based fantasy cricket platform for entertainment purposes only. No monetary transactions or prizes are involved. Not affiliated with, endorsed by, licensed by, or sponsored by the BCCI, the IPL, any IPL franchise, or any other cricket governing body. All team names, player names, and logos are property of their respective owners.
⚽ ALSO INTO FOOTBALL?
Play Fantasy Football, Draft & Predictor — on FootballDream.in
🎯 Predictor📋 Team Draft👤 Player Draft
Play Now → footballdream.in